15. What Does It Mean for Scripture to Be Inspired by God?
Essentialism, a Hunter’s Theology — Chapter Two: The Bible
I am writing this book because I have something to say about God.
More precisely, I have something to say about what I believe God has taught me, what I have experienced, what I have observed, and what I understand about His relationship with humanity.
And I have an enormous drive to communicate it.
That drive is part of what I understand inspiration to be.
I believe the themes and core convictions behind Essentialism, a Hunter’s Theology are inspired by God.
But they are expressed through the Lens of my experiences.
I am the person writing the words.
I am choosing the examples.
I am creating the stories, characters, games, and educational materials.
I am deciding how to communicate what I understand.
And I am responsible for those decisions.
I believe something similar happened with the biblical writers.
They had experiences they believed were important enough to preserve. They encountered God, received instructions, witnessed events, wrestled with questions, and developed understandings they wanted future generations to inherit.
Some were explicitly told to write.
Others were moved to sing.
Some recorded histories.
Others wrote letters, poetry, prophecy, or stories.
They communicated through whatever forms best expressed what they were seeing, thinking, feeling, and learning.
Inspiration gives us something worth communicating. Human experience shapes how we communicate it.
And sometimes, the experience itself is what inspires us.
Sometimes God Says, “Write This Down”
The Bible contains occasions when God explicitly instructs someone to record a message.
In Exodus 17:14, God tells Moses to write something as a memorial.
In Jeremiah 30:2, God instructs Jeremiah to write His words in a book.
In Revelation 1:11, John receives instructions to write what he sees and send it to the churches.
These passages present inspiration as direct divine instruction.
God has something He wants communicated.
He identifies someone to communicate it.
And that person becomes responsible for delivering the message.
But direct instruction is not the only way inspiration appears in scripture.
Consider the Psalms.
Sometimes You Have to Sing About It
The Bible contains an entire collection of poetry and songs.
The Psalms express gratitude, wonder, fear, anger, grief, hope, celebration, and praise.
Sometimes the writers rejoice.
Sometimes they complain.
Sometimes they ask God why He seems absent.
Sometimes they express desires that are disturbing.
Psalm 137, for example, ends with a violent expression of vengeance.
That passage preserves the emotional response of people experiencing devastation and displacement.
Recognizing that response does not require us to conclude that God endorses every desire expressed within it.
And that distinction matters.
A divinely inspired work can preserve a human response to God without making every human response a divine command.
We understand this principle whenever someone writes worship music.
A songwriter might experience God’s help during a difficult period and feel compelled to express gratitude.
Another might write a song while grieving.
Someone else might experience such overwhelming Joy that ordinary conversation seems inadequate.
So they write music.
They choose words.
They develop a melody.
They draw upon the musical traditions they know.
Their experiences influence the composition.
Their culture influences its sound.
And their understanding of God influences its message.
Two people can be inspired by the same passage of scripture and produce entirely different songs.
One might write a hymn.
Another might write gospel.
Another might write contemporary worship music.
Another might express the same conviction through a musical tradition unfamiliar to the others.
The differences do not automatically make one expression more inspired than another.
God can inspire the message without composing the melody.
And that is one way I understand the relationship between divine inspiration and human creativity.
Inspiration Does Not Erase the Writer
The biblical writers were human beings.
They had personalities.
They belonged to cultures.
They spoke languages.
They experienced fear, anger, affection, grief, and Joy.
They had different levels of education, different responsibilities, and different understandings of the world.
Their circumstances influenced what they wrote.
A prophet confronting political corruption would communicate differently from a poet celebrating a wedding.
A person recording a national catastrophe would have different concerns from someone offering advice about everyday relationships.
And a letter written to address problems within a particular community would not necessarily resemble a historical account intended for future generations.
That variety is part of the Bible.
Inspiration did not require its writers to become interchangeable.
Nor does it require us to pretend that every writer understood every subject perfectly.
The Bible contains human observations and interpretations alongside accounts of divine instruction.
It preserves disagreements, mistakes, failures, and changing understandings.
Some passages tell us what people did.
Others tell us what people believed.
Some describe what God instructed.
And others preserve what people wished God would do.
These are not always the same thing.
That is why we must read carefully.
Inspiration does not eliminate the need for interpretation.
And interpretation does not eliminate the responsibility to ask questions.
The Story Has a Through Line
In Question 13, we established that the Bible is the journal and historical log of God’s relationship with humanity.
In Question 14, we examined how those writings were produced, collected, preserved, and transmitted.
Now we can consider what connects them.
The Bible contains different authors, literary forms, historical periods, and perspectives.
Yet I recognize a continuing struggle throughout its accounts.
Greed breeds cruelty.
Again and again, people seek more than they need for status, control, or domination.
Again and again, they refuse responsibility for the suffering their decisions cause.
And again and again, God confronts the consequences.
We see the desire for status and the refusal of responsibility in Genesis.
We encounter exploitation, unjust rulers, and the abuse of vulnerable people throughout the histories and prophets.
We find warnings against the love of money, the pursuit of power, and the neglect of others in the wisdom literature and teachings of Jesus.
And Revelation confronts destructive systems of power while presenting a vision of restoration.
The circumstances differ.
The writers differ.
Their explanations differ.
But the struggle remains recognizable.
In Christian Essentialism, I understand this continuing opposition to Greed as part of the Bible’s theological continuity.
It helps me recognize the larger relationship being documented.
This does not mean that every biblical writer used my definition of Greed.
Nor does it mean that identifying a recurring theme proves divine authorship.
It means that, when I examine the collection through the Lens, I recognize a continuing concern that helps me understand the writings together.
God’s character remains consistent even as humanity’s understanding of Him develops.
And the Lens gives us a way to examine that development.
Inspiration Is Not the Same as Infallibility
This distinction is important.
When someone says that scripture is inspired by God, they may mean that God dictated every word.
They may mean that God guided the authors so their writings were free from error.
Or they may mean that God worked through human experiences, relationships, and creative expression to communicate what people needed to understand.
Christian traditions do not all explain inspiration in precisely the same way.
In Christian Essentialism, I understand inspiration as divine initiative and human response working together.
Sometimes God directly instructs.
Sometimes people are moved by their encounters with Him.
Sometimes they recognize something important through observation, reflection, or experience.
And sometimes they use imagination and creativity to communicate what they have learned.
This understanding does not require me to treat every human statement recorded in the Bible as a perfect expression of God’s intentions.
A biblical character can misunderstand God.
A writer can express anger.
A community can interpret an event through the knowledge available to it.
And a passage can preserve a human perspective that readers must examine rather than automatically imitate.
We have already established that God listens, responds, and accepts responsibility for the consequences of His choices.
Human beings must do the same.
Being inspired does not exempt a writer, teacher, prophet, or religious authority from responsibility for what they communicate.
Divine inspiration is not permission to stop thinking.
And it is certainly not permission to stop asking questions.
The Lens Demands Integrity, Not Respectability
We established in Question 14 that the Bible is not particularly concerned with meeting modern standards of respectable religious literature.
It contains sex, violence, bodily functions, disturbing imagery, and language intended to provoke.
Some passages are beautiful.
Some are comforting.
Some are frightening.
And some are downright vulgar.
But obscenity and vulgarity are culturally constructed categories.
The presence of sex or profanity does not automatically make a work sinful.
Nor does polite language automatically make it Kind.
A person can say fuck and demonstrate extraordinary Empathy.
Another can speak with impeccable manners while exploiting everyone around them.
The Lens examines conduct and consequences rather than appearances.
This matters when discussing inspiration because religious communities sometimes confuse cultural respectability with holiness.
They may assume that something cannot be spiritually meaningful if it is sexually explicit, profane, confrontational, or uncomfortable.
Yet the Bible itself contains examples of all those things.
The story needs to be told.
And sometimes telling the Truth requires language or imagery that challenges the audience.
That does not mean every shocking statement is inspired.
It means that shock, vulgarity, and discomfort are not sufficient reasons to dismiss a message.
We must examine what is being communicated.
We must consider its purpose.
And we must evaluate its consequences through the Lens.
The Lens demands integrity, not respectability.
Why I Write About Hunters
Now let me explain why this theology is being written for Hunters.
I am creating Essentialism, a Hunter’s Theology as part of a larger body of work for the Shaman States of America.
Within that culture, Hunters pursue creatures, catch slimes, travel between locations, gather at roadside stops, and participate in communal life.
They sing together.
They share meals.
They spend time in Hunter’s Lodges and Dot and Dash locations.
They play games.
They study.
They compete.
They cooperate.
And they learn throughout their lives.
The Hunters know that I am creating these books, decks, games, and educational materials for them.
There is no need to pretend that the materials appeared mysteriously.
They have an author.
They have a designer.
They have a publishing history.
And they have a purpose.
I am creating materials that make sense within the culture of the people who will use them.
This fictional setting also gives me room to discuss my theological convictions more freely.
Instead of spending every article fussing at people about their behavior, I can tell a story.
I can create a creature that demonstrates the consequences of Greed.
I can write about a Hunter who must choose between protecting someone and obeying an unjust authority.
I can explore what happens when a community confuses punishment with accountability.
Or I can create a situation in which the obvious solution turns out to cause more suffering than the original problem.
The stories allow readers to examine difficult questions through the experiences of characters.
They can consider the consequences of different decisions.
They can disagree.
They can experiment with alternative approaches.
And they can discover something about themselves without being directly accused of wrongdoing.
The fictional world is a means of communicating convictions that I take seriously.
The themes and core beliefs are inspired. Their expression is shaped by my experience.
That is how I understand my own creative process.
And it provides an example of how inspiration and human expression can work together.
Hunters Learn Through Play
The games and playing cards are not simply decorations accompanying the theology.
They are part of Hunter education.
Hunters need to understand the creatures they encounter.
They need to recognize behaviors, evaluate risks, develop strategies, and consider the consequences of their choices.
Games give them opportunities to practice those skills.
A Hunter can use a deck to study a monster.
They can play alone to explore possible approaches.
They can compete against another Hunter to practice anticipating an opponent’s decisions.
They can cooperate with a group to develop communication and teamwork.
And they can learn from mistakes without placing themselves or others in danger.
The same materials can serve different purposes throughout a Hunter’s life.
A beginner might use a deck to learn about creatures.
An experienced Hunter might use it to refine a strategy.
A retired Hunter might use it to teach someone else.
And everyone can simply enjoy playing.
Because fun is an important part of Hunter culture.
Learning is something a Hunter will do for their entire life.
That means learning should not be confined to classrooms, formal instruction, or solitary study.
Hunters need ways to learn alone.
They need ways to learn together.
They need ways to connect with their communities.
And they need ways to enjoy themselves while doing it.
Portable games can accompany them during travel.
Card games can be played while waiting for an assignment.
Competitive games can bring people together at roadside stops.
Cooperative games can help groups prepare for Hunts.
And communal activities can turn education into a shared experience.
This is not entertainment added to education as a reward.
Play is one of the ways Hunters learn.
And because Joy is a virtue of the Lens, enjoyment is not something we should dismiss as frivolous.
Joy is the recognition of goodness worth protecting.
Happiness is its expression.
Fun can be one way of experiencing and expressing that Joy.
A culture committed to making Joy possible should make room for it in the way people learn.
Hunters learn through play, prepare through practice, and build community through Joy.
Culture Gives the Message a Home
Consider how biblical communities communicated their beliefs.
They sang songs.
They recited stories.
They shared meals.
They observed festivals.
They taught their children.
They gathered for worship.
They discussed laws, traditions, and responsibilities.
And they passed their knowledge to future generations.
The writings that became scripture emerged within those living cultures.
The Psalms belonged to traditions of poetry, music, and worship.
Proverbs offered memorable teachings that could be carried into everyday life.
Jesus used parables about farming, fishing, money, households, weddings, and other familiar experiences.
Paul wrote letters addressing the circumstances of particular communities.
The forms reflected the lives of the people receiving the teachings.
The same principle informs the materials I create for Hunters.
A traveling culture benefits from portable books and games.
A communal culture benefits from activities people can share.
A hunting culture benefits from opportunities to study creatures and practice strategies.
And a culture committed to lifelong learning benefits from materials that remain useful as its members grow and change.
Inspiration gives us something worth communicating. Culture gives us a way to communicate it.
The form matters because the people receiving the message matter.
This is also why I do not believe everyone must express their understanding of God through the same religious traditions.
Different communities have different histories, languages, customs, and ways of learning.
They can recognize and practice the Lens through those differences.
Christian Essentialism explains my understanding of the Source.
But the Lens belongs to everyone.
And its virtues do not become less meaningful because someone encounters them through a different culture.
Inspired Does Not Automatically Mean Scripture
There is one final distinction we need to make.
I consider the themes and core beliefs of Essentialism, a Hunter’s Theology to be divinely inspired.
But that does not mean I consider this book part of the Bible.
Nor does it mean that every inspired song, story, sermon, or work of art should become scripture.
Inspiration and scriptural authority are related questions, but they are not identical.
A community’s recognition of scripture involves its understanding of particular writings, their history, their use in religious life, and their relationship to the community’s beliefs.
Different Christian traditions have reached different conclusions about some of those writings.
We discussed that history in Question 14.
Here, our concern is the nature of inspiration itself.
I believe God can inspire people without requiring everything they create to become sacred scripture.
A songwriter can be inspired.
An artist can be inspired.
A teacher can be inspired.
A storyteller can be inspired.
And a person who has experienced something important may feel compelled to preserve it for others.
But inspiration does not make the creator unquestionable.
It does not guarantee that every interpretation is correct.
And it does not eliminate the possibility of revision.
That is why I want readers to examine this book.
I want them to ask questions.
I want them to consider the arguments.
I want them to recognize where their experiences differ from mine.
And I want them to practice the Lens rather than simply memorize what I say about it.
Save your faith for God. Ask me questions.
The Responsibility of Inspiration
If we believe something is important enough to communicate, we also accept responsibility for how we communicate it.
We should consider whether we understand what we are saying.
We should examine the consequences of our teachings.
We should listen when someone identifies harm.
And we should be willing to correct ourselves when we discover that we have misunderstood something.
That responsibility does not disappear because we believe God inspired us.
In fact, I would argue that believing a message is divinely inspired gives us even more reason to handle it carefully.
We should not use claims of inspiration to demand unquestioning obedience.
We should not use them to establish superiority over others.
And we should not use them to avoid responsibility for the consequences of our words.
Those are ways Greed can corrupt religious authority.
The Lens offers another approach.
Empathy asks us to consider the people receiving the message.
Truth requires us to examine what we believe and communicate accurately.
Kindness asks us to consider how our words affect others without requiring us to conceal uncomfortable realities.
Joy reminds us that learning, creativity, and shared understanding can be sources of goodness.
Anti-Greed challenges us to resist using knowledge, inspiration, or authority to dominate others.
Together, these virtues help us evaluate both the message and our responsibility for communicating it.
What Does It Mean for Scripture to Be Inspired by God?
In Christian Essentialism, scripture is inspired by God because His relationship with humanity moved people to preserve and communicate what they understood about Him.
Sometimes He instructed them directly.
Sometimes their encounters with Him inspired their words.
Sometimes they responded through music, poetry, history, prophecy, letters, or stories.
Their experiences shaped their expressions.
Their cultures influenced their language.
Their circumstances influenced their concerns.
And their humanity remained present throughout the process.
Across those writings, I recognize a continuing struggle against Greed and its consequences.
I recognize God’s desire for humanity to learn responsibility.
And I recognize His intention to make Joy possible for everyone.
That is the theological continuity I find within the collection.
Divine inspiration does not require the absence of human creativity. It works through human beings who have something important to communicate.
And because those human beings remain responsible for their words, inspiration should encourage examination rather than prohibit it.
The Bible gives us many voices through which to explore God’s relationship with humanity.
We honor those voices by listening carefully, asking questions, and considering what they can teach us.
Not by pretending they are all identical.
Not by refusing to recognize their humanity.
And not by surrendering our responsibility to think.
Inspiration begins the conversation. The Lens helps us continue it.
Questions for Comprehension
- How does Christian Essentialism distinguish divine inspiration from the human expression of an inspired message?
- Why does recognizing the Bible’s different authors, genres, and cultural perspectives matter when interpreting scripture?
- How do Hunter games, playing cards, and communal activities illustrate the relationship between inspiration, cultural expression, and lifelong learning?
Questions for Personal Reflection
- Have you ever felt compelled to create, write, teach, sing, or share something because of an experience you considered spiritually or personally important? How did your experiences shape what you communicated?
- What activities make learning enjoyable for you? How might those activities help you continue learning throughout your life?
- How can you remain open to inspiration while accepting responsibility for examining, questioning, and correcting your understanding?
Save your faith for God. Ask me questions.
Return to Ask an Essentialist Theologian