09. Is a Better Future Available to Everyone?
Yes. Even to those who refuse it.
That is one of the most important promises of Essentialism.
A better future is not reserved for people who already practice the Lens.
It is not restricted to those who have made good choices, accepted help, or demonstrated that they deserve another opportunity.
And it is not limited to people who share our religious beliefs.
Essentialism is available to everyone.
Within Christian Essentialism, we understand this promise through God’s love for humanity.
We believe God loves people without requiring recognition, reciprocation, worship, or conversion.
Only God knows why someone does not believe in Him or chooses to reject Him.
And we believe He continues seeking ways for people to encounter love through others, even when they never recognize Him as its source.
The Lens—Empathy, Truth, Joy, Kindness, and Anti-Greed—belongs to no religious institution.
Anyone can learn to practice it.
Anyone can benefit from living through it.
And anyone can begin making different choices.
But having a better future available does not mean that everyone will choose one.
That distinction matters.
The Freedom to Refuse
In Question 8, we discussed the responsibilities of those who provide help and those who receive it.
Help may remain available even when someone refuses it.
A person may be afraid.
They may not believe what they are being told.
They may distrust the person offering assistance.
Or they may be unwilling to change the circumstances that make their current behavior possible.
Whatever their reasons, consent remains important.
We cannot force someone to accept the Lens.
We cannot make them cultivate Joy.
And we cannot compel them to recognize the value of Empathy, Truth, Kindness, or Anti-Greed.
They must make those choices themselves.
But free will does not eliminate consequences.
A person can refuse help and still experience the results of refusing it.
They can continue making harmful choices and discover that other people are no longer willing to accommodate those choices.
They can reject accountability and find that trust, access, or participation has been restricted.
These consequences do not mean that the person has lost their worth.
They mean that other people also possess dignity, agency, and the right to protection.
Everyone deserves the opportunity for a better future. No one is entitled to build that future by destroying someone else’s.
Greed and the Desire to Appear Good
This brings us to something I consider particularly important.
Greed breeds cruelty.
In Essentialism, Greed is the desire to take more than needed for status or to lord over another, coupled with a lack of personal responsibility for the pain that causes.
Greed does not always announce itself through obvious demands for money or possessions.
Sometimes it appears as a demand for admiration.
Sometimes it is the desire to control how other people perceive us.
And sometimes it is the determination to preserve a reputation for goodness without accepting the responsibilities that goodness requires.
A person may want to be seen as generous while exploiting those who depend upon them.
They may want to be recognized as kind while humiliating people who disagree with them.
They may want the authority associated with honesty while concealing information that would reveal their wrongdoing.
They may want to be praised for helping others while punishing anyone who refuses to participate in their version of events.
In each case, the appearance of goodness becomes more important than goodness itself.
And that creates a problem.
Because Truth exposes the difference between what people claim to be and what they actually do.
For someone who benefits from that difference remaining hidden, exposure can feel threatening.
It may threaten their reputation.
It may threaten their authority.
It may threaten their relationships, possessions, or status.
And it may require them to acknowledge pain they have caused.
Rather than accept that responsibility, some people attempt to silence those who reveal the harm.
They may deny what happened.
They may attack the credibility of the person speaking.
They may threaten consequences for anyone who offers assistance.
Or they may attempt to punish the people who refuse to help maintain their reputation.
This is how Greed can turn punishment into a means of concealment.
Instead of addressing wrongdoing, punishment is used to protect the person who committed it.
Instead of restoring relationships, it is used to preserve power.
And instead of encouraging Empathy, it teaches people that speaking the Truth is dangerous.
That is not accountability.
That is cruelty.
Truth Is Not the Enemy of Restoration
The Lens requires us to recognize what is happening.
That means we must distinguish between someone’s reputation and their behavior.
It also means we must be careful not to confuse our suspicions with established facts.
Not everyone who disagrees with criticism is greedy.
Not every defensive response is evidence of deliberate concealment.
People may be frightened, ashamed, confused, or genuinely mistaken.
Empathy requires us to recognize those possibilities.
But Empathy does not require us to ignore evidence.
And Kindness does not require us to pretend that harmful behavior is harmless.
Truth must remain Truth, even when acknowledging it is uncomfortable.
This is especially important when someone claims to be a good person.
Being good is not a reputation we acquire once and possess forever.
It is something we practice through our choices.
A person who values Truth must be willing to acknowledge mistakes.
A person who values Empathy must be willing to recognize suffering, including suffering they have caused.
A person who values Kindness must consider whether their actions actually help others.
And a person who practices Anti-Greed must be willing to surrender benefits obtained through exploitation.
That can be difficult.
It may involve losing status.
It may require restitution.
It may mean accepting boundaries established by people who no longer trust us.
But those consequences do not necessarily mean that restoration has become impossible.
They may be part of what makes restoration possible.
Exposure Creates an Opportunity
Within Christian Essentialism, I understand God’s desire for humanity as a desire for us to live through the Lens.
That includes people who have caused harm.
God’s love does not disappear simply because someone refuses to recognize what they have done.
But neither does His love require everyone else to conceal that harm.
In John 3:19–21, Jesus uses the imagery of light and darkness to describe the relationship between wrongdoing and exposure.
The passage describes people avoiding the light because they do not want their deeds revealed.
It also describes those who practice Truth coming toward the light.
That imagery is particularly meaningful to me.
The problem is not that Truth exists.
The problem is that someone may have built a life around keeping certain things hidden.
And when Truth makes those things visible, the person must decide what to do next.
They can continue denying responsibility.
They can attempt to punish those who revealed the harm.
They can abandon relationships rather than acknowledge wrongdoing.
Or they can begin making different choices.
Exposure does not automatically produce restoration. It makes the need for restoration visible.
What happens afterward depends upon the choices people make.
That is why I believe a better future remains available even to those who refuse it.
The opportunity does not disappear simply because someone initially rejects it.
They may return to it later.
They may reconsider after experiencing consequences.
They may eventually recognize that the status or control they were protecting was never worth the suffering it caused.
And they may begin learning to live differently.
But that possibility does not require the people they harmed to wait indefinitely.
Nor does it require those people to surrender their safety, boundaries, or peace.
The opportunity for restoration belongs to everyone.
The responsibility to participate in it belongs to the individual.
Jubilee Does Not Require Silence
This brings us back to Jubilee.
Within Christian Essentialism, Jubilee represents the ending of punishment, the cancellation of debts, the return of what has been taken, and the freeing of those who have been bound.
It is an opportunity to move forward.
But moving forward does not mean pretending the past never happened.
We cannot restore what has been taken if we refuse to acknowledge that it was taken.
We cannot repair harm while demanding silence from those who experienced it.
And we cannot create a better future by preserving the very arrangements that made cruelty possible.
Jubilee is not permission to continue exploiting people without consequences.
It is an opportunity to end the punishment and exploitation that have kept people bound.
That requires Truth.
It requires Empathy.
It requires Kindness toward those who have suffered.
It requires Joy as something worth restoring.
And it requires Anti-Greed so that the desire for status, control, or excessive gain does not recreate the same conditions.
The end of punishment is not the end of accountability.
It is the opportunity to build something better after accountability has made change possible.
A Better Future Does Not Require a Perfect Past
One of the cruelest things Greed can teach us is that our worth depends upon maintaining a particular image.
We may become so invested in appearing good that we are afraid to admit when we have been wrong.
We may believe that acknowledging harm will destroy everything we have worked to build.
And we may decide that preserving our reputation is more important than repairing our relationships.
But Essentialism offers another possibility.
We do not have to pretend that we have always been good in order to begin doing good.
We do not have to deny our mistakes in order to remain worthy of love.
And we do not have to demand that other people suffer so that we can preserve our sense of importance.
We can acknowledge what happened.
We can accept responsibility.
We can repair what we reasonably can.
We can respect the boundaries of those we harmed.
And we can begin making different choices.
That is what makes a better future possible.
Not the absence of mistakes.
Not the preservation of a perfect reputation.
And not the ability to avoid consequences.
But the willingness to recognize Truth and allow it to change how we live.
This is true for individuals.
It is true for families.
It is true for communities.
And it is true for institutions.
A society does not become better by insisting that it has never done anything wrong.
It becomes better by recognizing what must change and accepting responsibility for changing it.
The Promise Remains
So, is a better future available to everyone?
Yes. Even to those who refuse it.
They may reject assistance.
They may deny responsibility.
They may fight against exposure because they fear losing the benefits of being perceived as good.
And they may continue making choices that produce painful consequences.
But their worth does not disappear.
The possibility of change remains.
And the Lens remains available.
That does not mean everyone must continue offering assistance in the same way.
It does not mean victims must reconcile with those who harmed them.
And it does not mean communities must abandon the boundaries necessary to protect their members.
It means that the opportunity to become better is not reserved for people who have never done wrong.
Restoration is not making everyone happy. It is making happiness possible for everyone.
Including those who must first confront the harm they have caused.
Because a better future does not require us to be seen as good.
It requires us to become willing to do good.
And that begins with Truth.
Return to Ask an Essentialist Theologian
Go to Essentialism Question Ten: Why Would It Benefit You to Study Essentialism?